Bahan Ajar Interaktif Lingkungan
Upaya Meningkatkan Literasi Sains, Motivasi, dan Berpikir Kritis di SD
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31004/irje.v5i4.2390Keywords:
Literasi Sains, Teknologi Interaktif, Motivasi Belajar, Berpikir Kritis, Pembelajaran KontekstualAbstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji efektivitas program literasi sains berbasis lingkungan yang dipadukan dengan teknologi interaktif dalam meningkatkan motivasi belajar dan keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa sekolah dasar. Desain kuasi-eksperimen dengan model pretest-posttest control group digunakan pada 90 siswa kelas V dari tiga sekolah dasar, yang dibagi ke dalam kelompok eksperimen dan kontrol. Instrumen penelitian mencakup tes literasi sains, kuesioner motivasi belajar, observasi kelas, dan wawancara guru. Analisis data menggunakan uji-t dan ANCOVA menunjukkan bahwa terdapat peningkatan signifikan pada skor posttest motivasi siswa kelompok eksperimen sebesar 35%, serta peningkatan keterampilan berpikir kritis yang terlihat dari kemampuan siswa dalam mengajukan pertanyaan ilmiah, membuat hipotesis, dan menganalisis data ekologis. Penggunaan teknologi seperti Google Earth dan iNaturalist membantu siswa mengaitkan konsep ekosistem dengan fenomena nyata, meningkatkan keterlibatan dan pemahaman konseptual mereka. Implikasi praktis dari temuan ini adalah pentingnya pengembangan bahan ajar interaktif berbasis lingkungan dan pelatihan guru dalam pemanfaatan teknologi edukatif. Kontribusi unik penelitian ini adalah penggabungan potensi lokal lingkungan, teknologi interaktif, dan pendekatan kontekstual sebagai model pembelajaran terpadu yang efektif untuk memperkuat literasi sains dan motivasi siswa.
References
Busch, K. C., & Lombardi, D. (2025). Effective strategies for learning and teaching in times of science denial and disinformation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.70003.
Cooper, G. (2023). Examining science education in ChatGPT: An exploratory study of generative artificial intelligence. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32, 444–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10039-y
Creswell, J. W. (2023). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (6th ed.). Sage Publications
Deveci, İ., & Karteri, İ. (2020). Context-based learning supported by environmental measurement devices in science teacher education: A mixed method research. Journal of Biological Education, 56(5), 487–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2020.1821083
Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
Dhitasarifa, I., & Wusqo, I. U. (2024). The effect of STEAM approach digital teaching materials on increasing creative problem-solving skills. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 25(3), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1302079
Gleisner Villasmil, L. (2024). The effects of influencing factors on upper secondary school teachers’ use of digital learning resources for teaching. Computers and Education Open, 7, 100210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100210
Hidayati, A., Eldarni, Solfema, Handrianto, C., & Sunarti, V. (2023). Strategies for integrating a web-based learning environment based on authentic learning in distance learning for elementary school students. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, 10(3), 437–445. https://doi.org/10.20448/jeelr.v10i3.4840
International Science Council. (2024). Science literacy for an informed society: Understanding, evaluating, and applying scientific knowledge. International Science Council.
Kruse, J., Wilcox, J., Patel, N., Borzo, S., Seebach, C., & Henning, J. (2021). The power of practicum support: A quasi-experimental investigation of elementary preservice teachers’ science instruction in a highly supported field experience. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 32(4), 392–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2021.1949099
Lafifa, F., & Rosana, D. (2024). Innovations in assessing students’ digital literacy skills in learning science: Effective multiple choice closed-ended tests using Rasch model. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 25(3), 44–56. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1364528
Leow, M. H., & Abdul Razak, R. (2024). Malaysian elementary learners’ self-regulation, motivational beliefs and learner control motivation when experiencing online tutorials. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 25(1), 334–352. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1262408
Liman Kaban, A., Yataganbaba, E., Ates Cobanoglu, A., & Kokoc, M. (2024). Teachers' readiness for blended learning, their reasons, challenges, and suggestions for practising blended learning. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 25(2), 157–173. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1210124
Nagele, F., Hof, A., Auer, V., & Gimenez-Maranges, M. (2025). Investigating trees as an interdisciplinary phenomenon in climate regulation: An intervention study on iSTEM education and scientific literacy in secondary schools. International Journal of Science Education, 47(4), 475–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2024.2334295
Othman, M., Osman, A., Ahmad, S. Z., & Abdullah, N. (2024). Integrating segmenting and gamification principles in the design of interactive gamified programming assessments for low achievers. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 25(3), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1315427
Palalas, A., Pegrum, M., & Dell, D. (2024). Regaining focus: Promoting attentional literacy in digital higher education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 40(6), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.9627
Parker, M. J., Bunch, M., & Pike, A. (2024). Is anybody watching: A multi-factor motivational framework for educational video engagement. Computers & Education, 222, 105148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105148
Sanjiartha, K., Dewi, N. P. E., & Widyastuti, D. (2024). The impact of science literacy on critical thinking and decision-making skills in elementary education. Journal of Science Education Research, 12(1), 45–58.
Sibley, L., Lachner, A., Plicht, C., Fabian, A., Backfisch, I., Scheiter, K., & Bohl, T. (2024). Feasibility of adaptive teaching with technology: Which implementation conditions matter? Computers & Education, 219, 105108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105108
Spitzer, M. W. H., Langsdorf, L. E., Richter, E., & Schubert, T. (2025). Low-performing students benefit mostly from open-book examinations. Computers and Education Open, 8, 100239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100239
Thomann, H., Zimmermann, J., & Deutscher, V. (2024). How effective is immersive VR for vocational education? Analyzing knowledge gains and motivational effects. Computers & Education, 220, 105127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105127
Yulianti, D., & Herpratiwi. (2024). Development of a science, environment, technology, and society-based learning module to foster critical thinking in elementary students. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 18(4), 1372–1384. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v18i4.21713
Uzun, S., & Şen, N. (2023). The effects of a STEM-based intervention on middle school students' science achievement and learning motivation. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202319315
Zidny, R., Sjöström, J., & Eilks, I. (2020). A multi-perspective reflection on how indigenous knowledge and related ideas can improve science education for sustainability. Science & Education, 29(2), 145–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00100-x
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Marheni Rayung Puspaningrum, Devi Anggi Friani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
