Cost Optimization Analysis of Energy Efficiency During Compressor Shutdown at Platforming Unit I

Authors

  • Lian Safitri Polytechnic of Energy and Mineral Akamigas
  • Budi Sulistiyo Nugroho Polytechnic of Energy and Mineral Akamigas
  • Zahru Wilda Pratiwi Polytechnic of Energy and Mineral Akamigas
  • Abdul Jalil Dumai Oil and Gas Company
  • Wanda Trihadi Dumai Oil and Gas Company
  • Zulkarnain Dumai Oil and Gas Company

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/irje.v4i4.1243

Keywords:

Tinjauan Keselamatan Pra-Startup, Manajemen Keselamatan Proses, Insiden Keselamatan Proses

Abstract

The compressor (C-100) located in the Hydrobon & Platforming I unit is designed to meet the need for recycled gas to keep the H2/HC ratio optimal in the Platforming I section and minimise the rate of coke formation in the reactor. In addition, a Compressor (C-100) is used during the start-up process of the Platforming I unit to maximise LPG production. However, PT X is currently focusing on reformatting production to meet market demand, which prompts considering commissioning a Compressor (C-100) for energy efficiency and cost savings. The shutdown of the previous compressor, which consumed 2400 kWh per day at an annual electricity cost of IDR 8,347,273,344.00, has significantly reduced energy consumption. However, other operational costs, such as maintenance and lube oil make-up, remained during the period, with annual expenses of IDR 440,036,956.00 and IDR 48,741,977.00, respectively. In addition, energy from alternative sources such as steam and cooling water also increased to maintain process performance, with total annual operating costs of IDR 56,256,360,451.20 and IDR 179,789,760.00, respectively. Overall, the operating cost of the Compressor (C-100), which includes electricity, make-up lube oil, and maintenance, totalled IDR 8,836,052,276.80 each year. A review of the compressor operation could provide a solution for cost optimisation and energy efficiency for the company.

References

Abdul Majid, N. D., Mohd Shariff, A., & Rusli, R. (2015). Process Safety Management (PSM) for Managing Contractors in Process Plant. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries.

Bhusari, A., Gho, H., Ai, H., Sathananpally, S., & Mentzer, R. A. (2020). Process Safety Incident Across 4 Industries. Process Safety Progress, 39(2), 1–9.

Energy & Power Practice. (2016). Pre-Startup Safety Review: Risk Engineering Position Paper – 06.

Gunawan, W. (2020). Studi Efisiensi Boiler Terhadap Nilai Kalor Batubara Pada Boiler Jenis Pulverizer Coal Kapasitas 300 T/H. Jurnal Intent: Jurnal Industri Dan Teknologi Terpadu, 3(2), 122–130.

Nekhwevha, R. (2019). Analysis of Key Contributors to Process Safety Incident in Chemical Process Industry. Thesis, University of Johannesburg, South Africa.

Penn State Environmental Health and Safety. (2014). Compliance Guidelines for Pre-Startup Safety Review. PSM-SY-UN-016, September 24.

Ramadhani, S. (2022). Analisis Potensi Bahaya Pada Bagian Boiler Pembangkit Listrik Tenaga Uap (PLTU) Menggunakan HIRARC di PT. Indonesia Power Kabupaten Barru. Skripsi, Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar.

Saleh, J. H., Haga, R. A., Favaro, F. M., & Bakolas, E. (2014). Texas City Refinery Accident: Case Study in Breakdown of Defense-in-Depth and Violation of the Safety–Diagnosability Principle in Design. Engineering Failure Analysis, 121–133.

Sutton, I. (2015). Chapter 1 – Risk Management. In Process Risk and Reliability Management (2nd ed., pp. 1–64). Elsevier.

Young, M. (1989). The Technical Writer’s Handbook. Mill Valley, CA: University Science.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-26

How to Cite

Safitri, L. ., Nugroho, B. S. ., Pratiwi, Z. W. ., Jalil, A. ., Trihadi, W. ., & Zulkarnain, Z. (2024). Cost Optimization Analysis of Energy Efficiency During Compressor Shutdown at Platforming Unit I. Indonesian Research Journal on Education, 4(4), 3510 –. https://doi.org/10.31004/irje.v4i4.1243

Issue

Section

Articles